Best Pack for Crafting Efficiency

#	Pack	Score	Cards	Top-10 Power	≥1000 Density	Best Pull
1	Gardevoir	63800	234	16100 pts	69% (top 80)	Meloetta · 2500
2	Deluxe	53700	379	14200 pts	25% (top 80)	Rare Candy · 2500
3	Shining	48500	111	14400 pts	41% (top 80)	Poké Ball · 2500
4	Lunala	47750	140	15650 pts	39% (top 80)	Lunala ex · 2500
5	Solgaleo	47750	140	15650 pts	39% (top 80)	Lunala ex · 2500
6	Mega Blaziken	47550	139	16900 pts	36% (top 80)	Flame Patch · 2500
7	Mega Altaria	47550	139	16900 pts	36% (top 80)	Flame Patch · 2500
8	Mega Gyarados	47550	139	16900 pts	36% (top 80)	Flame Patch · 2500
9	Lugia	46300	136	15650 pts	36% (top 80)	Ho-Oh ex · 2500
10	Ho-Oh	46300	136	15650 pts	36% (top 80)	Ho-Oh ex · 2500

Note: density is computed from the top 80 highest craft-point cards in each pack (for comparability).

Related goals

View all

Best Pack for Beginners

Broad value for new players

/goals/best-pack-for/beginners/

Best Pack for Rare Cards

More high-point cards in pool

/goals/best-pack-for/rare-cards/

Best Pack for Mewtwo

Keyword goal (name match)

/goals/best-pack-for/mewtwo/

Best Pack for Charizard

Keyword goal (name match)

/goals/best-pack-for/charizard/

Best Pack for Pikachu

Keyword goal (name match)

/goals/best-pack-for/pikachu/

Best Pack for Fire Cards

Element goal (requires element coverage)

/goals/best-pack-for/fire/

Internal links help crawlers discover deeper pages and improve topical clustering.

FAQ (Goal-specific)

Decision support (snapshot-based)

What is the best pack for "Best Pack for Crafting Efficiency" right now? +

Based on the snapshot (2026-02-03), the top pick is "Gardevoir" (score 63800). Runner-ups: Deluxe, Shining, Lunala.

How does this help crafting efficiency? +

Packs with more high craft-cost cards reduce future crafting needs. "Gardevoir" shows strong concentration: ≥1000 density 69% (top segment).

What does the score measure? +

It’s a deterministic score using the rule on this page (Methodology). It relies on in-game craft points and the pack pool, not real-time prices. This makes it stable and reproducible.

What are the best pulls in the #1 pack? +

Top high-value pulls (by craft points) include: Meloetta, Protective Poncho, Mega Gardevoir ex. Best pull: Meloetta.

Why do you use a snapshot instead of real-time data? +

Snapshot data is easier to keep accurate without running an API. Rankings update when the dataset updates; the date is always shown so you can judge freshness.

How close are the top packs—can I pick any of them? +

The score gap between #1 and #2 is 10100. If it’s small, you can choose based on personal targets (specific cards) after checking each pack’s pool page.

Where can I see the full list of cards in the best pack? +

Open the pack page: /pack/gardevoir/. You can also click any card to view its details page.

Tip: If the result feels off, check the snapshot date and compare two packs using the table above.

Data Notes

Snapshot: 2026-02-03

This pack contains 55 high-cost cards (≥1000 pts), including 4 premium pulls (≥1500 pts).

High-value cards

55 cards ≥1000 pts · 4 cards ≥1500 pts

Examples (≥1000):

Meloetta Protective Poncho Mega Gardevoir ex Meowth

Examples (≥1500):

Meloetta Protective Poncho Mega Gardevoir ex Meowth

Points coverage

100%

234 / 234 cards have points

Element coverage

32%

75 / 234 cards have element

Element coverage mainly affects element-based goals (not most value goals).

This site uses a snapshot dataset (non-real-time). Coverage varies by upstream version and improves after data patches.

Methodology

We score packs by how many high craft-cost cards they contain, weighted by points.

* Rankings are snapshot-based (non-real-time) and intended for decision support. Scores are comparative across packs for the same goal.

Back to all goals