P
PocketMeta

Best Pack for Grass Cards

If you're building a grass collection, choose packs that include more grass Pokémon and higher craft value.

Snapshot: 2026-02-03
👑 Best Choice
Deluxe
Total Cards: 379 · Score: 42340
Data snapshot: 2026-02-03
Top 10 Power
14200 pts
High Value Density
25% ≥1000 pts (top 80)
Best Pull
Rare Candy
View card · 2500 pts

"Contains 56 grass cards. Total craft points (matching only) = 9670. Example: Buzzwole ex, Beedrill ex, Buzzwole ex, Celebi ex, Decidueye ex."

Quick links (Top 3 packs)

Fast navigation

Leaderboard (Top 5)

#1
Deluxe
Top pulls: Rare Candy, Pikachu ex, Darkrai ex
Score
42340
Cards
379
#2
Mega Blaziken
Top pulls: Flame Patch, Klefki, Lilligant
Score
26721
Cards
139
#3
Mega Altaria
Top pulls: Flame Patch, Klefki, Lilligant
Score
26371
Cards
139
#4
Solgaleo
Top pulls: Lunala ex, Solgaleo ex, Lillie
Score
25475
Cards
140
#5
Lunala
Top pulls: Lunala ex, Solgaleo ex, Guzma
Score
23210
Cards
140

Top 10 Comparison

Compare packs by score, pool size, high-value density, and best possible pull (snapshot-based).

# Pack Score Cards Top-10 Power ≥1000 Density Best Pull
1 Deluxe 42340 379 14200 pts 25% (top 80) Rare Candy · 2500
2 Mega Blaziken 26721 139 16900 pts 36% (top 80) Flame Patch · 2500
3 Mega Altaria 26371 139 16900 pts 36% (top 80) Flame Patch · 2500
4 Solgaleo 25475 140 15650 pts 39% (top 80) Lunala ex · 2500
5 Lunala 23210 140 15650 pts 39% (top 80) Lunala ex · 2500
6 Crimson Blaze 21951 103 15650 pts 35% (top 80) Aegislash · 2500
7 Lugia 20430 136 15650 pts 36% (top 80) Ho-Oh ex · 2500
8 Dialga 18783 126 15250 pts 19% (top 80) Dialga ex · 2500
9 Ho-Oh 18170 136 15650 pts 36% (top 80) Ho-Oh ex · 2500
10 Shining 16806 111 14400 pts 41% (top 80) Poké Ball · 2500

Note: density is computed from the top 80 highest craft-point cards in each pack (for comparability).

Related goals

View all

Internal links help crawlers discover deeper pages and improve topical clustering.

FAQ (Goal-specific)

Decision support (snapshot-based)
What is the best pack for "Best Pack for Grass Cards" right now? +
Based on the snapshot (2026-02-03), the top pick is "Deluxe" (score 42340). Runner-ups: Mega Blaziken, Mega Altaria, Solgaleo.
Is element data complete enough for "Grass" ranking? +
Element coverage for "Deluxe" is 87%. Matched grass cards: 56, total craft points (matched only): 9670.
What does the score measure? +
It’s a deterministic score using the rule on this page (Methodology). It relies on in-game craft points and the pack pool, not real-time prices. This makes it stable and reproducible.
What are the best pulls in the #1 pack? +
Top high-value pulls (by craft points) include: Rare Candy, Pikachu ex, Darkrai ex. Best pull: Rare Candy.
Why do you use a snapshot instead of real-time data? +
Snapshot data is easier to keep accurate without running an API. Rankings update when the dataset updates; the date is always shown so you can judge freshness.
How should I use the "Grass" pack goal? +
If you’re building a grass collection, prioritize packs with higher grass card count and higher matched craft points. Then check the pack page to see the full pool.
How close are the top packs—can I pick any of them? +
The score gap between #1 and #2 is 15619. If it’s small, you can choose based on personal targets (specific cards) after checking each pack’s pool page.
Where can I see the full list of cards in the best pack? +
Open the pack page: /pack/deluxe/. You can also click any card to view its details page.

Tip: If the result feels off, check the snapshot date and compare two packs using the table above.

Data Notes

Snapshot: 2026-02-03

This pack contains 20 high-cost cards (≥1000 pts), including 2 premium pulls (≥1500 pts).

High-value cards
20 cards ≥1000 pts · 2 cards ≥1500 pts
Examples (≥1000):
Examples (≥1500):
Points coverage
100%
379 / 379 cards have points
Element coverage
87%
329 / 379 cards have element
Element goals depend on element labels; lower coverage can reduce ranking reliability.

This site uses a snapshot dataset (non-real-time). Coverage varies by upstream version and improves after data patches.

Methodology

We score packs by (1) how many cards match the target element and (2) the craft points sum of those matching cards, with a small overall value weight. Packs with low element coverage are down-ranked.

* Rankings are snapshot-based (non-real-time) and intended for decision support. Scores are comparative across packs for the same goal.